Talk:Doctrine 1/@comment-97.120.52.228-20100919201430

This is a somewhat obtuse doctrine, since it's possible Epicurus is talking about a god ("eternal being"), but that is not likely. Why would he talk about the nature of gods, when they "do not concern themselves" with us? Nor would Epicurus likely posit Ideals for us to seek but cannot acheive. I think he is speaking about a state that can be reached by anyone -- a person that is comfortable with their own acheived values (they are "happy"), and minds their own business, understanding that other's values are not within his immediate control and discretion. He therefore does not interfere with the chosen values of others and does not even express an opinion as to their worth or merit ("exempt from partiality"). To deign to interfere with others would be a sign of weakness. I do think this is a doctrine that fosters the notion of seeking invulnerability -- but on earth, not in the heavens. Wes Costello